The term anti-detect browser gets thrown around a lot, but from a technical angle it feels like a bold claim. Every browser still leaves signals behind — whether that’s timing, behavior, environment quirks, or correlations outside the browser itself.
What I find more interesting isn’t whether tracking exists (it obviously does), but where the real breaking points are. Some tools focus heavily on fingerprint randomization, others on strict profile isolation, and some rely on controlling consistency rather than randomness.
Curious how people here view this:
Are these tools fundamentally limited by the browser runtime itself?
Does most detection today rely more on browser data or everything around it?
At what point do these browsers stop providing meaningful advantages compared to traditional isolation methods?
[link] [comments]
from hacking: security in practice https://ift.tt/zWoGAYC
Comments
Post a Comment