Hey everyone,
I'm incredibly grateful to share that my project pwnexe just passed 100 stars on GitHub! I can't thank you all enough for the support, feedback, and interest you've shown. It's been a wild ride working on this, and seeing the response from the community means a lot to me.
That said, I want to be fully transparent about something.
Some of you have pointed out that parts of my code seem AI-generated—and you're not wrong. So here’s the full story.
I've been involved in malware research and development for the past 3–4 years. After a while, writing the same types of malware over and over got repetitive, and I decided to try something different. I built my own AI system that was trained on millions of malware samples—currently over 11 million.
The idea was to use AI not to replace me, but to augment what I do—helping me generate core components, like the ping module or parts of the C2 server logic you see in pwnexe. I always intervene, tweak, and refine the output, but the AI has helped accelerate the process.
I understand this may be controversial. I know I’ll get downvotes and criticism for saying this out loud. But I also believe in being honest with the community. If you're a developer and understand what your code is doing, I don't think there's shame in using AI as a tool to boost productivity.
As for the AI itself, I plan to open-source the core of it, along with the training pipeline. There’s still tuning left to do, but once it’s ready, I hope others can build something creative and useful from it—with responsibility.
Thanks again for the stars, the feedback, and for sticking with me on this journey. I’ll keep pushing updates—and keep it real with you all.
Stay tuned,
vibe malware author
[link] [comments]
from hacking: security in practice https://ift.tt/JgVuOsy
Comments
Post a Comment