Could it be reasoned that the ease of hacking of an obfuscation compares equally with the obfuscation's use? Such as Pig Latin is easy to use, but just as easy to hack. Could an obfuscation that's painful to decrypt at user level be as painful to hack, or would it just not even be desirable to use on either end at all? I have an obfuscation which has been gnarly to produce and will undoubtedly be painful to use at root and user level, although that's essentially the idea behind it.
Thank You
a.△
[link] [comments]
from hacking: security in practice https://ift.tt/Vl8mbsv
Comments
Post a Comment